Potential use of nanofiltration membranes in treatment of industrial wastewater from Ni-P electroless plating

Nanofiltration (NF) membranes are a relatively new class of membranes which have properties in between those ofultrafiltration (UF) membranes and reverse-osmosis (RO) ones. Their separation mechanisms involve both steric (sieving) effects and electrical (Donnan) effects. The significance of this membrane, besides having small pores is the membrane's surface charges, which allows charged solutes that are smaller than the membrane pores to be rejected along with bigger neutral solutes and salts. Furthermore it is capable of rejecting multivalent ions effectively, and on the other hand lets the monovalent ions pass through. These are the characteristics that make the nanofiltration membrane a potential process to reject heavy metal ions, which in general are multivalent ions. In this study, the potential use of a nanofiltration membrane for rejection of heavy metal ions such as Ni 2÷ from wastewater from Ni-P electroless plating industry was studied. A composite NF membrane designated as HL membrane was used. The characteristics of the membranes were analyzed using single salt rejection studies of NaC1, MgC12, Na2SO4, NiSO 4. The wastewater from the Ni-P electroless plating industry was found to contain various cations such as nickel, zinc and sodium. In order to ascertain the effect of ion rejection in a multicomponent system, the rejection behaviour of Ni 2+ion in mixed solutions ofNa2SO 4 and NiSO 4 was tested and the rejections were then compared to those obtained using real solutions. The results show that in general the rejection of Ni is high regardless of the presence of other ions. The experimental data were also analyzed using two predictive models, namely Donnan steric pore model (DSPM) and ion transport model. The models are based on the extended Nernst-Planck equation but solved using different approaches and parameters. The results from the models were compared to find which model gives better agreement with the experimental findings.

Heavy metal ion Ni 2+can be separated successfully from monovalent ion Na + and can be treated from Ni-P electroless plating waste using a negatively charged NF membrane. This could be achieved even at a low pressure o f 4 bar. However for a larger scale industrial application, a more detailed study is required. In this study, HL membrane was characterized by rejection of single salt, mixture and by AFM imaging. HL membrane is a negatively charged membrane but the rejection A+ c C~ Cb C~.b ------ Porosity o f the membrane concentration in membrane, mol m -3 Ion concentration in membrane, mol m -3 Concentration in bulk solution, tool m -3 Concentration o f i component in bulk solution, mol m -3 Cj.,, - - Concentration o f i component on membrane surface, mol m -3 C*~.= - - C o n c e n t r a t i o n o f i c o m p o n e n t on membrane at membrane-feed surface, tool m -3 C~.o - - Concentration o f i component in feed, mol m -3 Ctp --Concentration o f i component in permeate, mol m -3 C~,. - - C o n c e n t r a t i o n o f i c o m p o n e n t on membrane at membrane-feed surface, tool m -3 D.l,p - - Hindered diffusivity, m2s-1 Dr. . - - Bulk diffusivity, m2s-1 F - - Faraday constant, 96487 C mol -) G - - Hydrodynamic lag coefficient Jr - - I o n flux (based on membrane area), tool m -3 s-1 J - - Volume flux (based on membrane area), mol s -1 J - - Water flux (based on membrane area), tool s-I K -l - - Hydrodynamic enhanced drag coefficient K,. c K..a L M. M' M' zSa t~ r /~ Rob~ T Ax Xd --------------- Hindrance factor for c o n v e c t i o n Hindrance factor for diffusion Water permeability, m s -~ Pa -~ Factor relative to salt diffusion, m 2 s-~ Factor relative to ion diffusion, m 2 s -1 Factor relative to salt convection Factor relative to ion convection Pressure, bar Effective pore radius, m Gas constant, 8.3143 J mo1-1K -~ Experimental rejection Temperature, K Effective m e m b r a n e thickness Effective m e m b r a n e charge Greek - - M e m b r a n e thickness from m e m b r a n e wall - - Steric partitioning term - - Ion transport, % Ratio o f ionic or solute radius/pore radius - - Viscosity o f solution, Pa s Salt reflection coefficient Electric potential in radial direction, V - - ~t ~g - - Subscripts b i P o Bulk -- i component Permeate - - M e m b r a n e / p e r m e a t e surface - - F e e d / m e m b r a n e surface - - - - R e f e r e n c e s [1] Mass.gov. 2001. Industrial wastewater, http:// www.state.ma.us/dep/bwp/iwww/files/314emr3.htm (23 October 2002). [2] D.D. Dubey, Waste minimisation in electroplating units in Delhi. http://www.cleantechindia.com/ eicnew/industrial.htm (23 October 2002). [3] N. Ortiz, M.A.F Pires and J.C. Bressiani, Use of steel converter slag as nickel adsorber to wastewater treatment. Waste Management, 21 (2001) 631-635. [4] C.L Li, H.X. Zhao, T. Tsuru, D. Zhou and M. Matsumura, Recovery of spent electroless nickel plating bath by electrodialysis. J. Membr. Sci., 157 (1999) 241-249. [5] N Feldstein and M. Feldstein, Composite electroless nickel coatings for the gear Industry. http:// w w w . a b s o l u t e e h .com/sur f a c e / _ d o w n l o a d / electroless.pdf (30 October 2003). [6] A.M.Y. Chong, Y.S. Wong and N.F.Y. Tam, Performance of different microalgal species in removing nickel and zinc from industrial wastewater. Chemosphere, 41 (2000) 251-257. [7] S. McAnally, L. Benefield and R.B. Reed, Nickel removal from a synthetic nickel plating wastewater using sulphide and carbonate for precipitation and coprecipitation. Separ. Sci. Technol., 19 (1984) 191217. [8] P.R. de Carvalho, K.H. Chong and B. Volesky, Evaluation of the Cd, Cu and Zn biosorption of heavy metals onto Chlorella vulgaris. J. Environ. Sci. Health A, 29(2)(1995) 389-409. [9] K. Paker, Waste treatment of spent electroless nickel baths. Plating Surface Finishing, 70(3) (1983) 52. [10] Z. Ujang and GK. Anderson, Treatment and reclamation of heavy metals by reverse osmosis in the plating industry. 2nd International Symposium Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse, Crete, Greece, 1995. [11] D. Bhattacharyya, A.B. Jumawan and R.B. Grieves, Charged membrane ultrafiltration of heavy metals from nonferrous metal. J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 51(1) (1989) 176-186. [12] B. Chaufer and A. Deratani, Removal of metal ions by complexation-ultrafiltration using water soluble macromolecules: perspective of application to wastewater treatment. Nuclear Chem. Management, 8 (1998) 175-187. [13] Z. Ujang and CtK. Anderson, Application of lowpressure reverse osmosis for Zn 2÷and Cu2÷removal from wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 34(9) (1996) 247-253. [14] J.M.M. Peeters, J.P. Boom, M.H.V. Mulder and H. Strathmann, Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions. J. Membr. Sci., 145 (1998) 199-209. [15] K.-H. Aim, K.-G: Song, H.-Y. Cha and I.-T. Yeom, Removal of ions in nickel electroplating rinse water using low-pressure nanofiltration. Desalination, 122 (1999) 77-84. [16] Y. Garba, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon and Gt Dorange, Ion transport modelling through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sei., 160 (1999) 187-200. [17] W.R. Bowen, A.W Mohammad and N. Hilal, Characterization of nanofiltration membrane for predictive purpose-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci., 126 (1997) 91-105. [18] W.R. Bowen andA.W Mohammad, Characterisation and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance - - a general assessment, Trans. IChemE, 76A (1998) 885-893. [19] K. Mehiguene, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon, J. Cabon and G. Dorange, Copper transfer modeling through a nanofiltration membrane in the case of ternary aqueous solution. Desalination, 127 (2000) 135-143. [20] Y. Garba, S. Taha, N. Gondrexon and G Dorange, Ion transport modelling through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 160 (1999) 187-200. [21] T. Tsuru, S. Nakao and S. Kimura, Calculation of ion rejection by extended Nernst-Planck equation with charged reverse osmosis membranes for single and mixed electrolyte solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Japan, 24 (1991) 511-518. [22] P. Schirg and F. Widmer, Characterization ofnanofiltration membranes for the separation of aqueous dye-salt solutions. Desalination, 89 (1992) 89-107. [23] S. Lee, J. Moon, S.-K. Yim and J. Cho, The relationship between flux decline of NF membranes with nom transport characteristics: convection versus diffusion, Desalination, 147 (2002) 237-241. [24] GM. Rios and R. Joulie, Investigation of ion separation by microporous nanofiltration membranes. AIChE J., 42(9) (1996) 2521-2528. [25] J.M.M. Peeters, J.P. Boom, M.H.V. Mulder and H. Strathmann, Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions. J. Membr. Sci., 145 (1998) 199-209. [26] A. Seidel, J.J. Waypa and M. Elimelech, Role of charge (Donnan) exclusion in removal of arsenic from water by a negatively charged porous nanofiltration membrane. Environ. Eng. Sci., 18(2) (2001) 105-113. [27] J.E. Cadotte, R.J. Perterson, R.E. Larson and E.E. Erickson, A new thin-film composite seawater reverse osmosis membrane, Desalination, 32 (1980) 25-31. [28] M. NystrOm, L. Kaipia and S. Luque, Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 98 (1995) 249-262.