| The alternatives described at the regenerative thermal and catalytic post-combustion also applies to this technique. The advantages of regenerative catalytic post-combustion are: -
No problems with corrosion of the exchanger -
Homogenization of the gas flow in the bed -
Energy recuperation far pushed through -
Relatively lower functioning costs -
More compactly than thermal oxidation -
Lower oxidation temperature so that less support fuel is necessary -
Low NOx production; approximately 20 - 30% of the NOx at thermal post-combustion -
CO are destroyed with the other components -
High constant and reliable performances possible -
By the low temperature less heat insulation has been required than at thermal post-combustion -
More lower fire risk with respect to thermal oxidation The disadvantages are: -
More lower output for VOC disposal than thermal oxidation -
System are sensitive for changes in energy-input of the gas -
Risk of dioxin shaping connections chlorinated at presence of -
All catalysts are liable to catalyst far grants and polluting substances. -
Substance must be removed for post-combustion -
Deactivated catalyst can be regenerated not but must be removed. -
High investment costs -
Can hide the ceramic beds -
At discontinue functioning must be again warmed up the bed every time -
Large scope and weight -
Much maintenance of moving parts In most of the cases thermal regenerative system are placed instead of catalytic since the thermal output is already very high. A catalytic system is in comparison more expensive. Click here for more information over gas scrubbers, exposure limits and explosive limits For more books and reading information see our website: Air treatment books overview |