|
The alternatives described at the regenerative thermal and
catalytic post-combustion also applies to this technique.
The advantages of regenerative catalytic post-combustion are:
-
No problems with corrosion of the exchanger
-
Homogenization of the gas flow in the bed
-
Energy recuperation far pushed through
-
Relatively lower functioning costs
-
More compactly than thermal oxidation
-
Lower oxidation temperature so that less support fuel is necessary
-
Low NOx production; approximately 20 - 30% of the
NOx at thermal post-combustion
-
CO are destroyed with the other components
-
High constant and reliable performances possible
-
By the low temperature less heat insulation has been required than
at thermal post-combustion
-
More lower fire risk with respect to thermal oxidation
The disadvantages are:
-
More lower output for VOC disposal than thermal
oxidation
-
System are sensitive for changes in
energy-input of the gas
-
Risk of dioxin shaping connections chlorinated at presence of
-
All catalysts are liable to catalyst far grants and polluting
substances.
-
Substance must be removed for post-combustion
-
Deactivated catalyst can be regenerated not but must be removed.
-
High investment costs
-
Can hide the ceramic beds
-
At discontinue functioning must be again warmed up the bed every
time
-
Large scope and weight
-
Much maintenance of moving parts
In most of the cases thermal regenerative system are placed instead of
catalytic since the thermal output is already very high. A catalytic system is in comparison more expensive.
Click here for more
information over gas
scrubbers,
exposure limits and
explosive limits
For more books and reading information see
our website:
Air treatment books overview
|